Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The LG G7 ThinQ body is noticeably lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's incredibly thicker and was released many years before. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, so it offers some additional features and performance optimizations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better looking display than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower count of pixels in each display inch, it also counts with a lot brighter display, a little bit higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way bigger display. LG G7 ThinQ has a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.