Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a global score of 84.3, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, so it provides you some extra features and performance tweaks. LG G8 ThinQ is a noticeably older and much thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG made it much lighter anyway.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a sharper screen than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse display density, it also counts with a really larger screen, way more brightness and a slightly better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 63 percent greater battery size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor, a lot more MP camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
The LG G8 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.