Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8S ThinQ is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 82.5 score against 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8S ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, so it gives some extra features and optimized performance. LG G8S ThinQ's construction is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's noticeably thicker and was released 5 years before.
The LG G8S ThinQ features a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a larger display, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a just a bit greater screen pixels density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery life than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 3550mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.