Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. LG G8X ThinQ is a notably older and incredibly thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG was able to build it lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a bigger screen and a little greater pixels density. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a larger camera aperture for better images in low-light situations, a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with way more MP and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.