Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Titan gray |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a score of 85.4 against 77.8. LG K92 is a way older and noticeably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG was able to build it a bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the LG K92 has an older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than LG K92, because it has a just a little more pixels per screen inch, a bigger display and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. The LG K92 counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than LG K92, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light captures, a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a way higher video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a slightly better storage to install applications and games than LG K92, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery life than LG K92, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG K92 is also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.