Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 has a global score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. The LG Q70 is a older and extremely thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG made it a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the LG Q70 has the older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The LG Q70 counts with a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than LG Q70, because it has a bigger display, a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than LG Q70, because it has a lot better video quality, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than LG Q70, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery life than LG Q70, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
The LG Q70 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.