Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Holographic white |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 global score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner than LG Stylo 6. These phones come with Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
The LG Stylo 6 features a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because it has a bigger display, a bit better pixels count per inch in the display and a way higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage for applications and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery life than LG Stylo 6, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures, a lot better video resolution, a back facing camera with way more MP and a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 6, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.