Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 82.5 score against 77.8. Both of these devices use Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, counting with lots of additional features. The LG V30S ThinQ body is noticeably lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is thicker and was released 6 years before.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG V30S ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.