Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. LG V35 ThinQ is a older and notably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG made it notably lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a much larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory capacity for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot larger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality, a much better video definition and a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 73% greater battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.