Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 77.8. LG V40 ThinQ is a much older and notably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG was able to build it extremely lighter anyway. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse pixels number per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light environments, it also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a much higher video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.