Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 87.6 score against 77.8. The LG V60 ThinQ design is a bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is notably thicker and was released many years before. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a just a little higher pixels density, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera with a lot lower resolution and a worse 7680x4320 video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit more storage to install games and applications than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V60 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.