Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 77.8. LG Velvet is a incredibly older and much thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG made it somewhat lighter anyway. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than LG Velvet, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a just a little higher display density and a bigger display.
LG Velvet counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Velvet, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots better photos and videos than LG Velvet, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations, a way higher video definition, a back camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.