Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. The LG Wing is a older, much thicker and heavier cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than LG Wing, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bit greater screen density and a bigger screen. LG Wing features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Wing counts with a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit better camera than LG Wing, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery performance than LG Wing, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
The LG Wing not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.