Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 85.3 against 77.8. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Microsoft Surface Duo 2's construction is a lot older, somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, much more brightness and a little bit greater pixels quantity per inch of display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a back camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features improved battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4449mAh.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.