Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 89.6 against 77.8. These phones use Android operating system, but Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Motorola edge is a notably older and a lot thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than Motorola edge, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bigger screen and a just a bit better display pixel density. The Motorola edge counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola edge counts with a little bit better storage to install games and applications than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Motorola edge, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola edge, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger camera sensor.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola edge is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.