Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 86.1 score against 77.8. Motorola Edge 20's design is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's way thicker and was released 3 years before. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 20 has 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a just a little better pixels number per inch in the display, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a larger screen. Motorola Edge 20 features a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery life than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.