Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a much older and incredibly thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the older 12 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a just a little better pixel number per inch in the display, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with better battery duration than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro and Motorola Edge 20 Pro both have similar cameras, because although the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has slower 24 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.