Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | Mineral Gray |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 84.7 against 77.8. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has 12 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Motorola Edge (2022)'s construction is much lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's notably thicker and was released just 20 months before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a bigger display, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge (2022) features a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 384 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher video quality and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Motorola Edge (2022) is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.