Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 78.5 against 77.8. Despite of the fact the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still notably lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the older 12 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has much more screen brightness, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a bigger display and a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same video frame rates, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 30 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.