Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 80.9 against 77.8. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is an older and incredibly thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola was able to build it just a bit lighter anyway. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has the older 12 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a bigger display, a way brighter screen, a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a better camera than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 200 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.