Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 83.4 score against 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is a little lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is notably thicker and was released around 12 months before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has way more brightness, a little higher screen density, a bigger screen and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro's camera is just as good as vivo X Fold 3 Pro's camera, and although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and video in poorly lited situations and a smaller camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and a 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.