Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 81.9 against 77.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Neo and the vivo X Fold 3 Pro were released with only 5 months difference, Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is much thicker but also lighter.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen, a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a brighter display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 50 MP, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos, a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.