Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is way thicker but lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and they were released only a couple months apart. Both of these devices come with the same Android 14 operating system.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a larger screen, a lot brighter screen, a much higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a just a bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have a 0.77 inches sensor and a camera with a 50 MP resolution, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's memory for games and applications is just as good as the vivo X Fold 3 Pro one, both have exactly the same 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.