Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 81.5 score against 77.8. The Motorola Moto G 5G is a older and incredibly thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola managed to make it a little bit lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G 5G has 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Moto G 5G, because it has a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch and a larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G 5G counts with a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Moto G 5G, because it has a 14% more battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a better resolution back-facing camera and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.