Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 82.6 score against 77.8. The Moto G 5G Plus is a older and a lot thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola made it just a bit lighter anyway. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a larger display, a quite greater count of pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a 5700mAh battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better video resolution, a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.