Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Power, getting a global score of 77.8 against 76.1. These phones use Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a notably newer and much thinner device than Motorola Moto G Power, but it's just a little bit heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better screen than Moto G Power, because it has a just a little more pixels per screen inch, a larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage for applications and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Power, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.