Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021)'s score of 76.5. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is way newer and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto G Power (2021)'s, but it's a little heavier. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a lot greater screen density, a bigger display and a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher video definition, a way larger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with a better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power (2021). If you want to save some dollars, you can get Moto G Power (2021), giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.