Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus (2021) is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 79.3 score against 77.8. Moto G Stylus (2021) is an extremely older and extremely thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola could make it just a little lighter anyway. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a back camera with more MP and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.