Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G100 has a score of 88.9, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Despite of the fact Motorola Moto G100 is extremely older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still just a little lighter. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G100 has older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Moto G100 features a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Moto G100, because it has a little better number of pixels per inch in the screen, a larger screen and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G100, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Moto G100, because although it has a lot less MP back camera, and they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way larger back camera sensor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G100, because it has a 14% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.