Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 86.2 score against 77.8. Moto G200 5G's design is just a little bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released 2 years before. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Moto G200 5G has a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Moto G200 5G, because it has a larger screen, a little bit better display density and a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit longer battery duration than Moto G200 5G, because it has a 14% larger battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better camera than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.