Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto G7 Plus's 76.1 general score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a noticeably newer and much thinner phone than Moto G7 Plus, although it is heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a bigger display and a just a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G7 Plus features a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back-facing camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.