Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Moto G8 Power's 76 score. These devices work with Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Moto G8 Power, it's incredibly thinner and also a lot newer.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better looking screen than Moto G8 Power, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display, a larger screen and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution. Moto G8 Power has a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher resolution back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G8 Power, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G8 Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.