Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 80.5 score against 77.8. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G9 Plus has the previous 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it's also notably older, much thicker and a bit heavier.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Moto G9 Plus, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger display and a little better pixel density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus features an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures slightly better photographs and videos than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger camera aperture to take better images in low-light environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto G9 Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.