Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a score of 77.8 against 76.4. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is much heavier than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's notably thinner and newer. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.