Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a general score of 77.8 against 77.4. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's notably thinner and also incredibly newer. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a way bigger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a lot better video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Force Edition. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Force Edition, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.