Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, with a 77.8 score against 77.6. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is extremely newer and way thinner than Motorola Moto Z3's, but it's also heavier. These devices use Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto Z3, because it has a much larger display, a bit higher pixels count in each inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto Z3 counts with an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 90% more battery size. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than Moto Z3, because it has a camera with lot more mega pixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger sensor and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z3, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.