Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 score. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but also notably heavier than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Moto Z3 Play counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little greater display pixel density, a way larger screen and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a much better video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 90 percent more battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.