Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 84.6 score against 77.8. Motorola One 5G's construction is just a little lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's noticeably thicker and was released 4 years before. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Motorola One 5G, because it has a little bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger display.
Motorola One 5G features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Motorola One 5G, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor and a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola One 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.