Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 81.6 against 77.8. The Motorola One 5G Ace is a noticeably older and extremely thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola managed to build it a little bit lighter anyway. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a bigger display, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a little greater pixels amount in each display inch.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a 14 percent more battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better video quality and a camera with a better resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.