Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Despite of the fact Motorola One Action is much older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a lot better 2200 x 2480px resolution.
Motorola One Action has a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Action, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, because it has a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola One Action is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.