Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Although Motorola One Hyper is much older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a bigger display, a little higher pixels number per inch in the display and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution. Motorola One Hyper features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola One Hyper is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.