Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 80.7 score against 77.8. Motorola One Vision is a much older and way thicker device than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola made it somewhat lighter anyway. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One Vision counts with a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a more MP back camera, a much larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 63% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.