Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Even though Motorola One Zoom is a lot older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bigger screen and a little bit better amount of pixels in each inch of display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola One Zoom features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher video quality and a camera in the back with more MP. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.