Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 87 score against 77.8. Despite of the fact Motorola razr (2020) is incredibly older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Motorola razr (2020) has a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit better number of pixels per display inch, a bigger display and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better video definition, a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a higher 50 MP resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.