Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 15 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | -- |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 414 pixels per inch | -- |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s body is newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same brightness, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a quite bigger display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) and vivo X Fold 3 Pro both count with extremely similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s memory for applications and games is very similar to vivo X Fold 3 Pro's one, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and a 50 MP resolution camera in the back, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger aperture.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features longer battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.