Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and White | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an overall score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Even being the best in this comparison review, Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a noticeably older, a lot thicker and a little heavier phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a larger display, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger sensor capturing way higher quality pictures.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has superior battery performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.