Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 35.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2007-11-13 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1945.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | -- |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | -- |
| Adreno 750 GPU | GPU |
| 6.3 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 1 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 1.4 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 300 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 7.36 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is way better than Nokia 8800 Arte, with a 77.8 score against 35.7. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is much newer and a lot thinner than the Nokia 8800 Arte's, although it is noticeably heavier. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a lot bigger display, a much greater display density and a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has more megahertz cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 1000mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.