Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Nokia 9 PureView, getting a 77.8 score against 76.4. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is newer and much thinner than Nokia 9 PureView's, but it's noticeably heavier. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a little worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a really larger screen.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3320mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Nokia 9 PureView, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Nokia 9 PureView. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Nokia 9 PureView, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.