Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a general score of 77.8 against 75.8. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is much newer and way thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S's, although it's a little bit heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a bigger display, a bit higher pixels number per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a more MP back facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and faster video frame rates.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some money and get the nubia Red Magic 3S, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.