Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is newer, a bit lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a larger screen, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, way more brightness and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with superior battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the nubia Red Magic 5S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.